Amy Poehler and Tina Fey star as siblings whose ever-longing adolescence rug is pulled out from under them, in”Sisters”. Maura Ellis (Amy Poehler) is told by her parents (Dianne Wiest and James Brolin) that they are planning to sell their home in Orlando, and asked to come and clean out the things from her childhood bedroom. Her parents also ask that she tell her sister, Kate (Tina Fey), because she doesn’t take bad news well. Maura, a recently divorced nurse, is constantly trying to help people, including writing motivational quotes that she is constantly giving to her sister. Kate is an unorganized and immature stylist, who is living in her friend’s house, while her teenage daughter, Haley (Madison Davenport), is living elsewhere and refusing to tell Kate where she is staying. After finding out the truth, Kate convinces Maura that they have to throw one last party at the house so that Maura can experience the kinds of things that she was oblivious to growing up. One thing leads to the next, and the two ladies cause a wild night of loud music and debauchery sure to leave a memory to last a lifetime.
Ever since the success of party films like “Animal House” and “Bachelor Party”, films have constantly been trying to capture the magic of hilarious characters combined with madness in material to bring the loudest laughs out of it’s audience. “Sisters” is the latest failed attempt at such a goal. First of all, going into this movie I had no idea just how much the party had to do with this film, despite noticing many scenes at the night of in the trailer. The film’s ridiculous two hour run time created a lot of pacing issues that had me reaching for my watch more than one time. There just isn’t enough compelling or funny material here to make these two hours a smooth transition, so the movie drags on more than one occasion. There is also a fine offering of improv comedy for many of the scenes involving the two main characters. This movie didn’t provide me with a ton of laughs, but the few it did were ruined by improv comedy that drags on for far too long, creating a high demand for an editor who knows how to bring out the most in each laugh. Beneath the surface, there is definitely a decent movie below all of this pointless material that should’ve been left on the outtakes short during the closing credits of the film.
As for the performances of two of SNL’s brightest female influences; it’s hit and miss. The chemistry between Poehler and Fey will always be there, as their friendship blossoms on more than one occasion. These two have fun working together, so who are we to fault how many times they combine their efforts for fans of the duo? The biggest problem for them is the obstacle in material that is written for them by screenwriter Paula Pell. The dialogue in this movie is more times than not crude and juvenille, and it just doesn’t feel like the right brand of humor for the intelligent starlets. Because of the awkwardness in material, the two often feel like they are two actors portraying a character, instead of becoming that character smoothly. I did enjoy Brolin and Wiest as their aging-but-hip parents. The film just couldn’t cut to these two enough, and there was more than one occasion where they carried great comedic timing for the film. Their lines feel smooth and not rehearsed because they are saying things that normal parents their age say, as to where their daughter counterparts are acting like 40 year old tweens who cry at the slightest thing not going their way. There are also nice cameos from Saturday Night Live veterans like Maya Rudolph, Rachel Dratch, and Bobby Moynahan. As well as a cameo by a WWE Superstar playing a drug dealer that can’t be missed. I can’t believe no other critic has made this comparison yet, but this is basically a female “Step Brothers”. The title is obvious enough, but the Poehler/Fey combo more than slightly resemble manchildren that were Will Ferrell and John C Riley. Why it worked for the latter though, is because Ferrell has made a career out of acting like a child. That is his schtick. Tina Fey is just too smart for her rebellious backstory, so it was at times proving difficult to believe her portrayal.
One thing I took away positively from the movie was the underlying issue of growing up in a world that has done it decades prior. There is a nice transition at the end of the movie that has our two protagonists coming across as completely different people, and for that shade of a second the screenplay of the film showcases some heart in an otherwise ruthless child of a comedy that just doesn’t know when to stop.
Overall, “Sisters” is too weak of a script for the tempting casting of Poehler and Fey as siblings. The comedy is there when it’s trimmed to a short-and-sweet kind of scene, but too many of the laughs are often ruined by repetition and punchlines lasting too long. Trim it a half hour, strengthen the character motivations of the main characters, and “Sisters” would’ve been a comedy that paid back more of the first act investment that drew it’s audience in. As it stands, the film is just one too many missed opportunities that never age to perfection.
5/10
It’s funny that you mentioned Step Brothers, because as I read, it sounded exactly like Step Brothers, without the genius of Adam Scott. I didn’t enjoy the improv in Step Brothers, and felt like Will Farrell and John C. Reily got high one night and were like “Ya know what would be funny?” and went on to write down these ideas that only would be funny if you were high (like the sleepwalking scene). It’s too bad that Sisters can’t rise above that…
YESSSS!!!! Step Brothers certainly isn’t innovative or original. If it works, it’s because Ferrell always plays typecast to that kind of character. Sisters is a wasted opportunity with some potential. There is a good film in there somewhere, but it’s far too long. An edit is definitely needed.
I guess I’m not the comedy type anymore…don’t know the last time I saw one I enjoyed…the trailer did nothing for me…why are comedies so hard to make to be enjoyed by people with intelligence these days?…is it just the younger audiences that like these movies?…I liked movies like Grumpy Old Men
Grumpy Old Men has a soft spot in my heart. I don’t know what is happening with comedies. My guess is that they are just getting lazier. It’s not something that has been building because I remember a few films from the years of 2007-2013 that I thought were hilarious. For some reason, people are cool with the same tired concepts being played on repeat.
I totally agree, this one dragged on… And both women have way more potential than what was offerd. Good review.
Thanks!
Thank you Melissa. I’m glad I could help.