{"id":9732,"date":"2026-06-18T20:18:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T01:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/?p=9732"},"modified":"2026-06-18T20:18:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-19T01:18:00","slug":"toy-story-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/?p=9732","title":{"rendered":"Toy Story 5"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Directed by McKenna Harris and Andrew Stanton<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Starring &#8211; Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, Joan Cusack<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Plot &#8211; Woody (Hanks), Buzz (Allen), Jessie (Cusack) and the rest of the gang&#8217;s jobs are challenged when they&#8217;re introduced to electronics, a new threat to playtime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rated PG for some thematic elements and rude humor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=c51ND9Hdbw0\">Toy Story 5 | Official Trailer | In Theaters June 19<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>POSITIVES<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Between five franchise installments ranging anywhere in quality between stoically solid to downright exceptional, and a thirty year imprint on the legacy of animated cinema, there&#8217;s ample argument to the assumption that Toy Story laid the foundation for Pixar&#8217;s sturdy structuring, and with its sixth film maintaining a proven consistency that has made it the single greatest animated series of all-time, there&#8217;s an ambitious outlook to the idea that this franchise could last another thirty years, especially with an explorative creativity that not only taps into a conflict as socially relevant as social media technology introduced to impressionable minds, but also an unfurled narrative effectively capable of mustering all of the emotionality that has treated its audience with respect. On the subject of that technology, I love that this script also from Harris and Stanton garners with it the responsibility of showing the advantages and detracting aspects of utilizing a system that preys on our disarmed vulnerability, with everything from bullying to societal disconnect leveling an evidential influence over the handheld devices that we spend an overwhelming majority of our time in, and considering the next big thing in the toy world has always been this series&#8217; bread and butter, with regards to this band of misfit toys having to overcome in order to maintain relevancy to its childlike owner, it taps into a preconceived safe zone of a particular age that in previous installments felt like uncharted territory, in turn offering a realistically humbling look at the consequences of technological dependency, without any of the heavy handed articulation that could easily turn it into feeling like an after school special in the most incompetent of hands. The script definitely abides by the same structural outline as its predecessors, in that it executes an isolated central story for one particular toy character, whose objection to return to normalcy for their human counterpart leads them to the land of forgotten toys, but it&#8217;s a formula that still manages to tap into an entertainingly endearing corridor of our the respective nostalgic nourishing that casually binds us a connective civilization, in turn justifying the air of its very existence with a creative outpouring that doesn&#8217;t feel lackadaisically lazy or cash-grab shilling, but rather determined to inject world-building layers to a story that has grown mutually with its adoring audience. Aside from the story, the emotional impulses are just as effectively vital to the air of the engagement, particularly with a much increased effectiveness for situational humor and spontaneous sight gags that materially breed a comfortable balance between every age group of the audience. Obviously, a lot of the opportunities stem from Harris and Stanton tapping into the hilarious hypocrisies of online aspects that anyone can certainly relate to, but even in the designs of these individual set pieces, there&#8217;s a far greater creativity to toy capabilities that seems to convey how much time and creative energy was spent fleshing out the uniqueness of these interactions, such as the introduction of one new character, named Smarty Pants, who serves as a tech toy to encourage potty training. As you might expect, this unavoidably taps into some toilet humor not typically associated with this particular brand of family cinema, but the gags themselves are tasteful enough without the need to inject bodily noises or visual transparency to the functioning they shamelessly orchestrate, with some deliveries even teetering on the edge of the movie&#8217;s PG-rating, without the need to truly exploit the childlike wonderment that it has spent a lifetime conjuring. If this isn&#8217;t enough, the animation is as breathtakingly breezy as it&#8217;s ever been with its colorfully vibrant designs, especially alongside utilizing a fantastically imaginative gimmick never before seen throughout this franchise. As hard as it is to believe, we the audience have never gotten to experience the world of make-believe from the toys perspective, and with Harris and Stanton optioning for a two-dimensional side of animated rendering, where the coloring and corresponding backdrops corroborate an unfinished side of imagination that only contains what&#8217;s front and center in the eyes of the child storyteller, we receive an effortlessly enabled outlining in the world of make believe when the dynamic duo opt to enact such a unique opportunity to three-dimensional animated techniques that artistically immerse us in so much detail of its aged toys and adolescent backdrops, appraising so much energetic exuberance and gently glowing affectionateness to a franchise that only grows all the more beautiful with age. Lastly, Tom Hanks and Tim Allen undeniably step back seamlessly into the air of the respective roles as Woody and Buzz, respectively, all the while maintaining the element of lived-in comradery chemistry between them that never grows any less endearing. While Woody and Buzz aren&#8217;t exactly whom I would consider the lead protagonists of the movie, as Cusack&#8217;s Jessie receives a far more significant slice of the framed focus, they still each bring so much commanding genuineness and radiant charisma to the integrity of their corresponding deliveries to character, maintaining with them an enticing component of indulging energy that feels as glaringly evident in their portrayals as it did in 1995. Hanks and Allen are great, but I think the most heavy lifting between this gifted ensemble are carried out by the newest additions of Conan O&#8217;Brien and Greta Lee, who as the new tech toys on the block bring a caustically sarcastic underlining in tone that makes each of them feel well aware of their intellectual capabilities among their toy peers. O&#8217;Brien continues his motivation after his scene-stealing turn in last year&#8217;s If I Had Legs I&#8217;d Kick You, with an equally unapologetic turn who grates aggressively on the nerves of anyone else he comes across, and Lee, while not exactly as confrontational as you would expect from some of the other antagonists of this franchise, still channels an overriding ignorance whose vocal autonomy feels like the technological manifestation of every tech billionaire that you&#8217;ve ever experienced in sound bite form, offering enough bluntly dry honesty in the air of her ostracizing observations that constantly rub Woody, Buzz, and Jessie the wrong way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NEGATIVES<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While Toy Story 5 did land on the upper half for me, in terms of franchise installments, it&#8217;s still far from a perfect film, particularly in some compromising components to the aforementioned script, that definitely could&#8217;ve used another rewrite to sacrifice some of the excessive fluff in this 97-minute outline. Simply put, there are a lot of moving plates to the maintaining of this movie&#8217;s focus, with as many as five ongoing subplots at any point throughout the duration, and while they all add something integral to the intended destination of this movie&#8217;s journey, some of them receive far too much time in their fleshing out, such as one subplot involving an army of Buzz Lightyear&#8217;s, which constantly strained to include itself among the many arcs centering around this primary conflict. Considering this arc not only opens up the movie, but also intrudes abruptly during the moments the structure seems to surmise some semblance of momentum for itself, it makes it feel an idea that is stemming from a completely different movie entirely, and while I definitely wouldn&#8217;t nix it all together from this finished outline of the script, I do feel like five or six times utilizing what minimal development it capably grasped was a bit excessive in its structural consistency, especially considering the script works tediously taxing towards maintaining each of these individual arcs with the kind of commitment as a movie twice its runtime. In addition to excessive subplots, the returns on supporting characters leave slightly more to be desired with certain characters who played a prominent role as recently as Toy Story 4, in turn wasting an overwhelming majority of the gifted ensemble who each return with the unfulfilled objective of brandishing some importance to the plot that they each casually sift in throughout. To be fair, none of them are doing an awful job, they&#8217;re just given these thankfully dire opportunities that fail to capitalize on the uniqueness that each of them bring to character, and while not including them would be a painfully distracting weakness at the movie&#8217;s foundation, including them only highlights how carried away that this franchise has gotten in attempting to maintain them for the next installment, an aspect that echoes louder than ever with this failing to find an important angle for Woody and Buzz until around the halfway point of the movie. Finally, while commenting on logic in a kids movie always gets me called out by a sensitive public attempting to protect their childhoods, there are an abundance of contrivances in the developmental sequencing of this plot that settled for convenience in the actions of their characters, such as the purpose of the aforementioned Buzz army, or Jessie&#8217;s markings of a past owner, which are somehow not washed off by her new family, in order for an outsider to enact her situational distancing from the other characters. The single worst part of this unfortunate aspect is that it unknowingly telegraphs certain character actions before they ever have a chance to transpire on-film, in ways that require you to silence disbelief in order to go along with it, and while it isn&#8217;t anything that&#8217;s entirely compromising to the enjoyment of the experience, it does highlight the kind of sloppy writing that keep it from reaching the levels of the first two movies of this distinguished franchise, serving as the few moments throughout where my attention waned on conveniences that were to surreal to be true, even in a movie involving plastic toys brought to life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OVERALL<br>Toy Story 5 justifies its extensive existence with a charmingly affectionate and colorfully radiant sixth installment to the franchise that assembles its toy protagonists to fight back against smart technology that intrudes upon that limited time during adolescence where imagination takes center stage. While the film attempts to spin too many plates, both with an excessive amount of characters and corresponding subplots, it&#8217;s still a cleverly insightful and morally responsible experience that still manages to capture your heart after all of these years, proving the unnecessity to lock it away from an adoring public just yet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>My Grade: 7.7 or B<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Directed by McKenna Harris and Andrew Stanton Starring &#8211; Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, Joan Cusack The Plot &#8211; Woody (Hanks), Buzz (Allen), Jessie (Cusack) and the rest of the gang&#8217;s jobs are challenged when they&#8217;re introduced to electronics, a new threat to playtime. Rated PG for some thematic elements and rude humor. Toy Story 5 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":9733,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[16,4,24],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9732"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9732"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9734,"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9732\/revisions\/9734"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/9733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/thefilmfreak.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}